Wilson on Outdoors: Can property owners deny recovery of wounded deer?

Q: Last year I shot a doe with my A31 tag in Los Angeles County (Archery Only-Either Sex). It appeared to be a lethal shot from 22 yards with decent placement. I tracked the blood to a privately owned ranch 100 yards away. I stopped tracking it when it appeared she went onto the ranch property. I then approached the ranch manager to get permission to continue tracking my deer. The owner initially agreed but after one of her co-workers talked to her, she retracted her permission about 10 minutes later. She requested we leave her property at once as she didn’t want people to think they approved of hunting. I didn’t have enough time to locate my deer and left brokenhearted.

I don’t like seeing animals die or suffer for no reason. I would never have shot if I would have known I couldn’t recover her. I believe I did everything legal and correct, but it shouldn’t be right that a deer goes to waste because of the bias of a property manager.

Is there anything I could have done to recover my deer? Do I have any rights or is there anyone I could have contacted? I’m still sick over the situation.

A: It’s unfortunate that this happened. Although the law prevents one from wasting the deer, the law does not permit trespassing to retrieve it. Perhaps if you’d contacted the local game warden, they may have been able to contact the ranch manager or owner for some possible assistance to prevent the deer from going to waste.

According to Todd Tognazzini, patrol lieutenant for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, it is recommended to hunt farther from private property boundaries to avoid this type of problem, as deer taken with archery usually travel farther after a lethal wound than those shot with a rifle. Tognazzini said he has never been refused when a fresh and legitimate blood trail is found leaving public land onto private property.

Q: I know that fishing from a public pier or first seaward public jetty/seawall doesn’t require a state fishing license. Does this also apply if a diver is spearfishing or collecting shellfish along such a jetty?

A: No, the person must physically be on the pier to legally fish without a license. Once the person is off the pier, or most seaward protective boundary placed to form a harbor, a fishing license is required. When diving from shore, he or she must be within 500 yards of their license (Fish and Game Code, section 1054.2).

Q: I am a beginner taxidermist and have done a few pheasants and ducks for myself but would like to do some free taxidermy for other people. Will I need a taxidermist license and/or migratory bird permit to mount ducks even if I don’t charge for my services?

A: California does not require a taxidermist license, but the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service does require a license for migratory waterfowl. A Federal Taxidermy Permit is required to possess migratory birds for taxidermy purposes if you do not otherwise have authorization to possess. For example, a taxidermy permit is required if you would like to taxidermy a friend’s (or customer’s) duck harvested during hunting season. A taxidermy permit is not required if you would like to taxidermy a duck you harvested during hunting season. Further information regarding this federal permit is available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife website.

This story was originally published July 19, 2016 at 3:39 PM with the headline "Wilson on Outdoors: Can property owners deny recovery of wounded deer?."