Karen Cuaresma: 51fifty debate goes far deeper than a soft drink

Re “Unusual turn in 51Fifty energy drink debate” (Page 8A, April 6): As someone with a Master’s degree in social work, I am not responding to either side of the 51fifty debate, but a few other issues. My first issue involves where the term 5150 originated.

The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (section 5150) is part of the California Welfare and Institions code, which has not been discussed. A summary of the section’s definition is: When a person, as a result of a mental health disorder, is a danger to himself or others or to him/ herself, or gravely disabled may be taken into a mental health facility for a 72-hour hold for evaluation.

My second issue is that it was stated that stigma is the No.1 reason those with mental illness do not receive help. I am of the utmost belief that this is one of the main reasons; however, I do not believe it is the No.1 reason. The No.1 is lack of resources. Many people with limited income also have limited choices.This makes it difficult even if a person wants to receive help to find professionals who can treat their issues.

This story was originally published April 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM with the headline "Karen Cuaresma: 51fifty debate goes far deeper than a soft drink."