Letters to the Editor

Tom McClintock: Bee should light (forest) fire under Senate

The federal government should stop diverting fire prevention funds to pay firefighting costs, says U.S. Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove.
The federal government should stop diverting fire prevention funds to pay firefighting costs, says U.S. Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove. Modesto Bee file

Re “Preventing forest fires is up to Congress” (Page 3B, July 7): The Bee rightly decries the self-defeating practice of raiding forest fire prevention funds to pay for escalating firefighting costs. Sadly, it focuses its support on a Band-Aid while taking another potshot at me for a “plan that has gone nowhere.”

Actually, The Bee’s preferred bill has gone nowhere, and for good reason. While HR 167 allows fire costs to be spent off-budget, it maintains the forest management policies that are causing an endless spiral of more fires and higher costs.

The Resilient Federal Forests Act, produced by the Federal Lands Subcommittee, permanently fixes the financing problem by accessing the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund within the budget while vastly increasing the acreage we can treat to prevent future fires. HR 2647 passed the House on a bipartisan vote last July, but it is currently blocked by just six Senate Democrats.

Perhaps The Bee would want to “light a fire” under them.

Rep. Tom McClintock, 4th California Congressional district and Chair of House Federal Lands subcommittee

  Comments