Warnings let readers, students make the choice
06/04/2014 4:32 PM
06/04/2014 4:33 PM
Kudos to the courageous students at UC Santa Barbara who are advocating for warnings about course material that could be harmful – not merely “offensive” – to war veterans and students who have been victims of assaults.
The author of the editorial, “Warning: This editorial might make you think” (May 21, Our View) might try thinking outside of a narrow, politically correct box and become knowledgeable about the seriousness of post-traumatic stress disorder.
The students simply favor informing others of graphic, violent content so that they can exercise wisdom as to what materials they expose themselves to without causing horrific mental distress. (Do you also oppose warning people with respiratory sensitivities of days with poor air quality?)
Why would you want to pour salt in the mental wounds of war veterans by having them unknowingly stumble into a raw and graphic depiction of violence?
I also take exception to the editorial’s attempt to disarm readers by giving examples of books that are considerably more mild than the numerous “R” and even “X”-rated books that are required reading in high schools and colleges.
It’s ironic that you oppose enabling students to be informed and think for themselves.
Pamela LaChapell, Modesto
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.