Gun conviction of Oakdale resident contradictory

06/16/2013 5:08 PM

06/26/2013 2:32 PM

Ralph Bradley Keith was recently convicted of a lesser gun charge after fighting a handful of gun-related charges for four years. The lesser charge stems from the idea that he fired his gun on his property in a direction that was deemed unsafe.

What do you get for that? You get a felony record, your job as a special needs teacher ripped from you, along with half your retirement, and you are declined the ankle bracelet program five times to find yourself back in jail to serve a 240-day sentence.

What does he have to look forward too? The possibility that there is no bed available at the time that he turns himself in or, likely, the best case scenario of about 76 days in jail.

With that mind, why do I see media reports all the time about repeat violent crime offenders avoiding jail time for ankle bracelets? Why does the firing of a gun on your own property in a direction you feel is safe warrant such a lengthy incarceration?



Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service