Keith Johnson: African pirates move west

01/30/2014 2:01 PM

01/30/2014 6:03 PM

On January 18th, a Greek shipping firm lost radio contact with one of its vessels, a Liberian-flagged, 75,000-ton oil tanker named Kerala, when it was just a few miles off the port of Luanda, Angola. What happened next is still in dispute. But maritime experts think the Kerala’s disappearance marks a dangerous new escalation of the oil-driven piracy that is tormenting mariners across the infamous Bight of Benin.

Maritime hijackings off of Somalia and the rest of Africa’s eastern coast are in sharp decline. But pirate attacks in West Africa have crept upward, turning the waters around the Gulf of Guinea into one of the centers of global piracy. About one of every five reported pirate attacks last year took place in the Gulf of Guinea, the International Maritime Bureau reported, but it estimates that only about one-third of West African attacks are actually reported.

The piracy on the western coast of African bears little similarity to piracy off the east coast, however. In short, it’s even more aggressive. And oil companies operating in the area, West African countries dependent on energy revenues for their fiscal well-being, and regions that rely on sub-Saharan crude such as Europe and China worry that this new breed of pirates may turn the region into a no-go zone for shippers and operators.

The Kerala’s disappearance came just after maritime security firms began warning of a suspicious, 200-ton tugboat prowling the waters off the Angolan coast. The Kerala’s owner, Dynacom Tankers Management Ltd., began to suspect it was again a victim of piracy. A Dynacom ship was the last ship successfully taken by Somali pirates; the ship and crew were released after 10 months of captivity in March 2013.

But never before had the criminal gangs that trawl the Gulf of Guinea struck so far south. Angolan navy officials said last week they were searching for the vessel, and warned about the threat of piracy to Angola’s energy-dependent economy.

Finally, Sunday, Dynacom re-established contact with its vessel: It had been hijacked. One crewmember was hurt, and “a large amount of cargo had been stolen” from the vessel, Dynacom said. International investigators were set to examine the ship, which headed for port in Ghana, to gather forensic evidence.

But the plot thickened. Angolan Navy officials now contend the Kerala’s crew faked the hijacking and headed to Nigerian waters on their own. The suspicious tug was just a “replica” of one used in another pirate attack nearby. “It was all faked, there have been no acts of piracy in Angolan waters,” Angolan Navy spokesman Capt. Augusto Alfredo told Reuters. Angolan officials later said the Kerala, which carried 60,000 tons of diesel, was found “empty.”

Maritime security experts, however, question the Angolan Navy’s version. They note that the incident appears to be a clear extension of the piracy that was once confined to the Gulf of Guinea and waters around the Nigerian Delta. It’s a different brand of piracy than that which plagued the waters off Somalia: more violent, and laser-focused on stealing oil and other petroleum products that fetch millions on the black market.

West African pirates don’t usually seize vessels to hold them for multi-million dollar ransoms. This is not a lawless coast, such as the one that still prevails across most of Somalia, making it tough to hide massive oil tankers and their crews for months at a time. Instead, most Gulf of Guinea piracy is essentially a maritime extension of the onshore oil theft that has plagued Nigeria for years: pirates are after cargos of refined products, such as the 60,000 tons of diesel the Kerala carried. Ian Millen, director of intelligence at the British-based Dryad Maritime, told Foreign Policy that pirates took about 13,000 tons of diesel off the Kerala.

“This incident bears all the hallmarks of Nigerian-based refined product cargo theft,” Millen added.

Some experts believe the uptick pirate attacks is due in part to the 2009 government amnesty for the Nigerian militants in the Niger Delta who had justified their attacks on oil infrastructure and their widespread theft of crude oil as a political protest. “With the political pretense lost, there is no longer any need for oil thieves to limit themselves to targets in the Delta,” a United Nations study said.

Dryad Maritime’s Millen says that in most attacks, pirates offload relatively small amounts of refined product onto costal vessels once the hijacked ship is in Nigerian waters; the Kerala theft amounts to about 4 million gallons. That U.N. report estimates that pirates could net as much $30 million per year from black-market of the stolen oil.

The spotlight on the Kerala, and West African piracy in general, comes in part because global pirate attacks are at a six-year low, Captain Phillips notwithstanding. Attacks have fallen about 40 percent since the 2011 peak, largely because of a successful campaign against Somali pirates, which has included better industry practices, more armed guards, and a robust international naval presence.

Fighting Gulf of Guinea piracy will be harder than in Somali, paradoxically because countries on the West Coast of Africa are not failed states. Each country in the region can defend its territorial waters. That rules out the kind of extraordinary, U.N.-sanctioned international naval cooperation that marked the anti-piracy campaign around Somalia. It also rules out the use of armed guards onboard ships, one of the keys to limiting Somali pirates’ success rate.

Some things can be done. Nigeria’s new navy chief has pledged to tackle oil theft and piracy. The European Union, which imports more oil than anyone else from the region, has its anti-piracy program with regional states up to cruising speed; the idea is to bolster the law-enforcement abilities of regional states with under-resourced coast guards. European navies, such as the Dutch, French and British, have also carried out training and exercises with some of their counterparts in the region. U.S. ships took part in one training mission for Nigerian commandos last fall. The U.S. Marine Corps also has a rapid-response team in Spain that can respond to West Africa piracy.

But two of the biggest customers for sub-Saharan oil, the United States and China, aren’t likely to send in their navies as they have in the Indian Ocean, dispatching frigates and forming standing task forces. That’s because much of West African piracy takes place within territorial waters, not the high seas.

China, the biggest importer of sub-Saharan crude, made major steps in its naval operations in 2008 when it sent ships halfway around the world to fight Somali pirates. That on-going deployment is seen as a crucial proving ground for China’s hopes of creating a blue-water navy. Despite China’s reliance on the region’s crude, there’s little chance of another Chinese anti-piracy task force heading for the Gulf of Guinea. Somali piracy might be coming to an end. Angolan piracy might just be starting.

Foreign Policy

Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service