Dan Walters: Brown’s appointees will nudge state Supreme Court leftward

07/24/2014 4:25 PM

07/25/2014 10:01 PM

The U.S. Supreme Court has undergone very obvious ideological cycles – depending on who happened to be in the White House when vacancies occurred.

Currently, the court has what might be called a 4-4-1 lineup, with four conservatives appointed by Republican presidents, four liberals appointed by Democrats and one GOP-appointed swing vote in Sacramento’s Anthony Kennedy.

California’s Supreme Court, arguably the nation’s most influential state court, has been no less prone to such swings. And with two appointments already and at least one more coming during his second governorship, Jerry Brown may be nudging it leftward – albeit not as far as his father Pat Brown did, nor as far as Brown 1.0 attempted to do.

This week, Brown nominated Stanford law professor Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, whose record indicates he will be a judicial liberal, to succeed Marvin Baxter, the court’s most obviously conservative member.

Having already named another law professor, Goodwin Liu, to the court, and with another vacancy still to be filled, Brown’s appointees will soon hold three of the seven seats. Because his appointees are in their early 40s, they’ll be making new law for many years.

The remaining four Republican appointees, including Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, are relatively moderate. So the Brown appointees will tilt the court to the left with the likelihood that Brown will have one or two more appointments in his second term.

The court was famously liberal in the 1960s and 1970s, thanks to appointments by Brown and his father, including two chief justices, Roger Traynor and Rose Bird. Its bent was most conspicuously displayed in repeated rejection of capital punishment, which was popular among Californians.

The appointment as chief justice of Bird, a longtime Jerry Brown friend who lacked any judicial experience, was a political disaster, in part because he passed over Stanley Mosk, a former attorney general and close friend of Pat Brown, who had appointed Mosk to the court.

Infighting among the justices leaked into the media and magnified the Bird court’s refusal to ratify any death sentences of murderers. It resulted in voters denying confirmation of Bird and two other Jerry Brown-appointed justices in 1986.

The rejection gave Gov. George Deukmejian, a conservative Republican and death penalty champion, the chance to name three new conservative justices, including Baxter, and his law partner, Malcolm Lucas, as chief justice. Republican Gov. Pete Wilson continued the trend in appointments, including that of Ron George as chief justice.

With history in mind, Brown 2.0 is obviously being more judicious in his Supreme Court appointments.

They have some symbolic aspects – one Asian American and one Latino so far – but their legal credentials, unlike those of Bird, are impeccable.

Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service