The Buzz: Did candidate statements make a difference in race for controller?

07/16/2014 5:09 PM

07/17/2014 5:17 PM

Voter guide statements

can be a decisive buy

At a maximum cost of $6,250, candidate statements in voter guides are a rare bargain in California campaigns.

Betty Yee was the only one of three Democrats in the controller’s field to buy a statement. It went to 10.6 million voter households, noting several endorsements and calling her “extraordinarily well qualified and a recognized expert in state budgets and fiscal policy.” She finished in second place, 481 votes ahead of Assemblyman John A. Pérez, who now is seeking a recount in 15 counties in an effort to surpass Yee and make the Nov. 4 ballot.

The voter guide statements are meant to encourage candidates to comply with voluntary spending limits. Controller’s candidates had to agree to spend no more than $5.44 million in the primary. Yee agreed. Pérez did not, but his spending seems likely to be well below $5.44 million.

Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin, who finished first, also did not accept spending limits. But she was surprisingly outpolled in many places by fellow Republican David Evans, who spent $600 and had a voter guide statement that said simply, “Most qualified for Controller.”

– Jim Miller

Worth repeating

“When the recount process is necessary, it should be easily implemented and every vote valued and counted equally.”

ASSEMBLYMAN KEVIN MULLIN, D-South San Francisco, pondering changes in the recount system.

Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service