Allegations arise in Peterson trial survey
01/09/2004 8:20 AM
11/19/2007 2:37 PM
Several university students said Thursday that they fabricated survey results factored into in a judge's decision to move Scott Peterson's capital murder trial out of Modesto.
Judge Al Girolami learned of the phony-poll allegation just before 5 p.m. and, through a court intermediary, refused to comment.
"We falsified the info," said a 20-year-old criminal justice student at California State University, Stanislaus. "The stuff we submitted wasn't true."
He referred to the 10-county Peterson bias survey compiled by 65 students and overseen by Professor Stephen Schoenthaler.
Informed Thursday evening of the students' claims, Schoenthaler said, "I'm stunned and I find it hard to believe. It seems impossible that I could have missed something like that."
University Vice Provost Diana Demetrulias said her office will launch an investigation today.
Chief Deputy District Attorney John Goold suggested that the revelation could cause Girolami to reconsider his decision.
"Oh, my God," Goold said when informed of the students' claims. "It certainly sounds like this would affect the underpinnings of the judge's decision."
The student and five others -- all seniors -- said Thursday that they made up every answer on all the surveys they submitted because they found it difficult to gather legitimate data.
They did it, they said, because they were short on time and money. They were required to participate in the survey for 20 percent of their grade and were given no money for dozens of lengthy long-distance phone calls, they said.
Another senior said she struggled to complete half of her required surveys, then gave up and faked the rest. Another said she refused to cheat but didn't have the resources to do the survey, so she didn't -- knowing that her grade could be lowered from A to C.
Three of the eight said they used answers from friends and relatives on some surveys, also in violation of survey ethics.
Goold said his office would discuss a course of action. Regarding the judge, Goold said, "If he is aware of impropriety, he can notify the parties to be in court tomorrow" to address "falsity before the court."
Peterson attorney Mark Geragos of Los Angeles said, "Hypothetically speaking, one should never put any credence in anonymous sources."
All students requested anonymity.
On the witness stand Thursday, Schoenthaler insisted that his methodology was sound when prosecutor Dave Harris questioned the survey's integrity.
"Is it possible that college students went home and simply made these numbers up?" Harris said later in court. "I think there is a significant likelihood of that."
Phone numbers not verified
Harris' arguments appeared to have little effect on Girolami, who said his decision to move the trial was heavily based on a "massive amount of publicity."
In conducting the survey, Schoenthaler said he required students to include the phone numbers they supposedly called when submitting data, but that he had not verified any by calling them himself.
But formulas developed to detect fraud didn't alert him to anything unusual, the professor said.
Before The Bee published the survey results Sunday, Schoenthaler said he used 65 students to poll 1,175 prospective jurors randomly by telephone in late November and early December. He said from 114 to 122 people responded in each of California's eight largest counties, plus Stanislaus and San Joaquin counties.
The survey suggested that more jurors without bias could be found in the Bay Area and Southern California than in Stanislaus County. Geragos submitted the survey as an official case exhibit, and the judge cited it when explaining his decision to move the trial.
Schoenthaler testified that no one hired him or paid him to do that survey or a smaller one in May. He has said he hoped to provide a public service and perhaps save taxpayer money.
In court Thursday, Harris questioned Schoenthaler's motives, suggesting the professor sought public distinction. He said the survey was poorly designed and gave students the opportunity and motive to falsify their data.
"You have to ask yourself what else is wrong with (the survey) when you ask college students for credit to go back to their house or their dorms to make long-distance calls," Harris said.
The students said Schoenthaler told them they could expect people further away to know less about the case. They said they fabricated the surveys accordingly.
"You just make it up," said a 21-year-old student.
Schoenthaler gave the students survey materials two days before Thanksgiving, he and they said.
"It's just an asinine thing to make a student do a week before finals," a 22-year-old student said. "There is no way (Schoenthaler) can say this is legitimate, because he wasn't there when we supposedly made it up."
A 21-year-old student said: "It's bogus."
Students unaware of survey use
Some students said they would have come forward earlier but they had no idea their fabrications would be used to help sway a judge making such an important decision.
A 35-year-old student said, "This is a death penalty case. This guy's life is on the line. I'm absolutely outraged."
University spokesman Don Hansen said discipline for dishonest work can range from writing a paper or community service to suspension or expulsion.
Vice Provost Demetrulias said her probe could take a week.
"We will initiate this in the morning," she said Thursday evening. "We take very seriously any scientific misconduct or suggestion of that. We will be working on it."
A class syllabus given to the students at the beginning of the fall semester states that 20 percent of the grade would be based on a class project. The description:
"Each student will be assigned to survey public opinion attitudes and knowledge on the telephone from 20 people in various parts of California to test hypotheses that will be done in class. The survey typically takes five or six hours to complete and an hour of practice."
Stephen Lubet of Northwestern University School of Law in Chicago said, "The point is to teach students, not obtain their labor."
Bee staff writer Garth Stapley can be reached at 578-2390 or email@example.com.
Bee staff writer John Coté can be reached at 578-2394 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.