Jurors won’t consider the most provocative of sexual harassment claims when they begin deliberating Wednesday whether Stanislaus County owes a former sheriff’s clerk hundreds of thousands of dollars.
At the close of a monthlong trial, Superior Court Judge Hurl Johnson on Tuesday decided to tell jurors they must wipe from their minds Lydia Lopez’s testimony that sheriff’s drug agent Bill Pooley urged on-the-job sex and put her hand to his crotch on Christmas Eve 2004.
Jurors will decide if sheriff’s management protected and promoted Pooley, who subsequently was elevated to police chief in Riverbank, while punishing Lopez until she quit in frustration.
Johnson nearly threw out the groping allegation a week ago at the request of attorneys representing Pooley and the county, because Lopez failed to report her story for 2½ years. But defense attorneys changed their minds in order to attack Lopez’s credibility with many of the 16 witnesses they’ve questioned since.
Never miss a local story.
For example, custodian Chris Martinez said Friday that he did not work on the holiday in question, contradicting Lopez’s testimony that Pooley backed away when Martinez came in the room. And Pooley testified Thursday that he had been transferred from the drug unit two weeks before and was not even on duty at the time Lopez claimed it happened.
Jurors heard both sides. But Wednesday morning, Johnson will tell them to forget the whole thing, he said Tuesday with jurors outside the courtroom.
Still in the record are Lopez’s claims that Pooley in 2006 whispered an oral sex come-on, leered at Lopez, commented on her legs and verbally fantasized about intercourse after he was promoted to sergeant.
Pooley steadfastly denied all of those allegations. His attorneys have painted Lopez as an imbalanced liar in search of a tax-funded payday, while her attorneys say the single mother struggled valiantly against a formidable good-old-boys network.
Witnesses included Sheriff Adam Christianson, who essentially said his loyalty to Pooley made irrelevant the results of an investigation into Lopez’s claims. The first-term sheriff is seeking re-election on the June ballot.
Christianson demoted Lopez instead of firing her, as recommended by a discipline board. On Tuesday, Sheriff’s Capt. Tim David acknowledged that Capt. Bill Duncan — Pooley’s father-in-law — was a member of that discipline board. And the demotion order included a reassignment for Lopez to County Jail — presided over by Duncan.
David also said Lopez violated department policy by pulling up on a special computer information regarding her husband’s gang buddies on the first day after she was assigned to the jail. She would have been punished if she hadn’t quit, David said.
Sheriff’s Det. John Rivera said the computer gave her access to sensitive information such as names and addresses of law enforcement officers and witnesses involved in a violent assault that landed Paul Lopez, a Norteño “shot-caller,” behind bars.
“If leaked into the gang structure, that’s invaluable and can be turned back to the street for retaliatory purposes,” Rivera said.
But Rivera turned up no evidence, he said, that Lydia Lopez leaked any such information in the five months that Rivera monitored Paul Lopez’s mail, telephone calls and chats with visitors. The surveillance ended when Lopez was transported to state prison for a term of 27 years to life, in December 2007, the same month Lydia Lopez filed her lawsuit.
Before his transfer, Lydia Lopez visited him 21 times, Rivera said.
Rivera also found that Lydia Lopez had two social security numbers. He tipped off federal officials, noting that he was unsure whether she profited from them or had been an identity theft victim.
Monitoring Paul Lopez’s calls produced an interesting conversation with his mother where they questioned Lydia Lopez’s lawsuit, Rivera said. Rivera noted this in a report, he acknowledged, because it could affect Lopez’s credibility in her claims against Pooley, whom Rivera called his friend.
While deliberating, jurors also are expected to focus on Lopez’s claim that the department refused to accommodate her depression disability as required by law. Experts on both sides have provided conflicting opinions.
Attorneys are scheduled to deliver closing arguments Wednesday at 9:15 a.m. in Department 23 at 801 10th St., Modesto.
Bee staff writer Garth Stapley can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 578-2390.