Republicans raise fears about border security in Senate immigration hearing
02/13/2013 1:50 PM
03/01/2013 2:54 PM
Senate Republican leaders on Wednesday demonstrated the fissures that continue to linger over proposals to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws.
The Senate is largely seen as the chamber that will have to lead efforts to pass any form of legislative change. But the upper chamber’s first hearing on comprehensive immigration reform revealed some Republicans’ strong fears that border security will be left by the wayside in any agreement.
“This is like deja vu for a lot of us,” Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, said at the hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I believe that the reason immigration reform failed in 2007 is because the American people don’t actually believe that Congress intends to follow through on important measures like border security, worksite enforcement, visa overstays and the like.”
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano testified on behalf of a comprehensive package. She called the “‘border security first’ refrain” an excuse that ignored progress on the border. She then shared a list of numbers that showed the U.S. Border Patrol has doubled from 10,000 agents in 2004 to more than 21,000 today, and that apprehensions have been cut by 49 percent in the past four years.
“Our borders in fact have never been stronger,” she said.
The immigration debate was thrust back into the national spotlight after Latinos demonstrated their political prowess in the November election.
President Barack Obama, who won re-election with 71 percent of the Latino vote, as well as a bipartisan group of senators, have since introduced proposals that call for a path to citizenship for the nation’s estimated 11 million illegal immigrants. A bipartisan group of members of the House of Representatives also is working on proposals.
In his State of the Union address Tuesday night, Obama emphasized the economic benefits of overhauling the country’s immigration laws.
He was expected to meet Wednesday with the four Democrats in the Senate bipartisan effort: Sens. Chuck Schumer of New York, Richard Durbin of Illinois, Michael Bennet of Colorado and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. The Republicans in the group – who aren’t part of the White House meeting – include Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida, John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Jeff Flake of Arizona.
“I think the country is tired of talking about it. I think it’s time to fix it,” said Graham, who is a member of the Judiciary Committee.
The Judiciary Committee hearing was disrupted three times by protesters who stood up during Napolitano’s testimony, waving signs and calling for her to stop deportations.
“Stop separating our families,” they chanted as officers led them out of the hearing.
Also testifying at the hearing were journalist-turned-activist Jose Antonio Vargas, AOL co-founder Steve Case and Janet Murguia, president of the National Council of La Raza, an advocacy organization.
Senators also called on Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, a research organization that supports tougher enforcement measures, and Chris Crane, president of the union for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, who criticized the lack of enforcement and questioned the authenticity of promises that greater enforcement would be part of a comprehensive package.
“I think most Americans assume that ICE agents and officers are empowered by our government to enforce the law,” Crane said. “Nothing can be further from the truth. With 11 million illegal aliens in the U.S., ICE agents are now prohibited from arresting illegal aliens solely on charges of illegal entry or visa overstay, the two most frequently violated sections of U.S. immigration law.”
The Obama administration announced in December that illegal immigrants who are arrested in minor crimes no longer will be targeted for deportation.
Vargas emotionally told his story of coming to America when he was 12 and learning that he was undocumented when he tried to get a driver’s license. Sitting in front of his Filipino-American family, which included his uncle Conrad Salinas, who served in the U.S. Navy for 20 years, he told of his mother’s decision to send him to the U.S. so he could have a better life. A crowd of undocumented immigrants in the audience cheered when he told the senators that he had questions for them.
“What do you want to do with me?” he said. “For all the undocumented immigrants who are actually sitting here at this hearing, for the people watching online, for the 11 million, what do you want to do with us?”
Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., described a “growing consensus” among Democrats and Republicans and questioned those who demand more enforcement.
“I fear they mean ‘enforcement only,’” Leahy said. “To them I say that you have stalled immigration reform for too long. We have effectively done enforcement first and enforcement only. It is time to proceed to comprehensive action.”
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., countered that the existing proposals sound more like “amnesty-only.”
Murguia acknowledged the concerns of some Republicans after the hearing but said she was encouraged by another Republican, Graham, who re-emphasized the progress made on the border.
“This is not going to be a cake walk,” Murguia said. “We have a lot of hard work to do.”
Rubio, who was not at the hearing, issued a statement later saying much was left to be done on the border and stressing “security triggers” in the proposal he’s helping to craft.
“If we are going to pass bipartisan immigration reform this year, the administration must accept the principle that security triggers must be met before anyone who is currently undocumented is allowed to apply for a green card,” Rubio said in the statement. “Secretary Napolitano’s refusal to accept this bipartisan principle at today’s Senate hearing is discouraging for those of us who are serious about permanently fixing America’s immigration system.”
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.