The owners of Hobby Lobby are seeking an exemption to the Affordable Care Act due to their religious beliefs. Their argument is disingenuous, would open a Pandoras box of legal issues, and should be rejected by the Supreme Court.
First, there is a legal distinction between a for-profit corporation and its shareholders. Shareholders benefit by being insulated from the liabilities of the corporation. It is the corporate entity to which the ACA applies. However, Hobby Lobby is asking the court to ascribe the religious beliefs of the shareholders to the corporation itself. Its asking the court to grant it a double standard whereby it reaps all the benefits of incorporating, yet allow it to disregard the corporate veil when it suits its purposes.
Second, health insurance is compensation earned by the employee. An employer cannot instruct an employee how to spend their salary. And its not OK to dictate how other compensation is used.
And finally, the notion that Hobby Lobby is only opposed to certain contraceptives that act as abortifacients is a farcical argument, as no FDA-approved forms of birth control cause abortions.
CHRISTOPHER C. DOLL
Health care makes her fear retirement