Matthew Webb: CVS should also ban booze, sugar

February 13, 2014 

There has been much hoopla over the CVS decision to discontinue tobacco sales at their stores. CVS is estimating the decision will cost them $2 billion, but feels the decision is correct as they are looking to position themselves as a health care provider. Here’s an interesting question: If CVS is looking to be a leader and has elected to discontinue the sales of a legal product, why not really become a leader and discontinue the sale of alcohol and sugary foods and drinks? Haven’t alcohol and sugary foods caused as much, if not more, damage to the health of the public? Or are those dollars too attractive for CVS to walk away from?



Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service