Protect the Merced River

March 16, 2013 

In your March 7 editorial, The Bee encouraged Congress to approve HR 934, which, if passed, would annul protection for a portion of the Wild and Scenic Merced River. This recommendation ignores the thorough process that led to protecting the river in the first place.

On Oct. 23, 1992, President Bush signed Public Law 102-432 that guaranteed permanent protection of the free-flowing upper Merced River.

This law was the result of a six-year comprehensive effort, which started in 1986 when a Placerville engineer proposed a dam and hydroelectric plant in El Portal. Hundreds of local residents and supporters from around the country rallied to inform and engage everyone, including our elected officials, conservation organizations, Merced Irrigation District board members, Lower Merced River watershed water users. In spite of differences, we reached consensus to establish "permanent" protection for the Upper Merced River.

Yes, the population of the Central Valley and demand for water has increased, but some things have not changed — the superlative wild and scenic Merced River values, rooted in a unique sense of place. You need to exhort the Merced Irrigation District to take responsibility for finding other sources of water storage without impacting the Wild and Scenic River boundary.


Upper Merced Watershed resident


Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service