California's "three strikes" law has incapacitated thousands of repeat felons, and appropriately so. But the 1994 law also has led to disproportionately long sentences for some individuals whose third strike was for a minor crime.
Proposition 36 would sand down some of the rough edges on this important law and ensure that it is applied equally across all 58 counties. But the measure would leave the law's strong heart in place. It deserves a "yes" vote on Nov. 6.
In 1994, voters enraged by the 1993 kidnap-murder of 12-year-old Polly Klaas by a repeat felon approved the initiative that created the "three strikes" law.
Under the law, judges must impose sentences of 25 years to life for people who are convicted of two violent or serious crimes and who then commit a third felony, regardless of what that third felony is. Serious and violent criminals deserve harsh sentences. But individuals who commit petty crimes on their third strike end up with sentences far in excess of what is fair.
Their incarceration comes at a cost. The Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that Proposition 36 would shave $70 million to $90 million off the $9 billion annual prison budget.
Voters rejected an attempt to water down the "three strikes" law in 2004. Proposition 36 is much more modest. As it is, "three strikes" doubles sentences for criminals who are convicted of a violent or serious felony, and commit another felony. About 33,000 of the 138,000 inmates are serving enhanced sentences under this provision. Proposition 36 would not affect second-strikers.
About 9,000 inmates are serving sentences of 25 years to life after being convicted of two violent or serious felonies, plus a third felony.
Some third strikes were serious or violent. Others were minor, such as shoplifting. If voters approve the measure, felons would need to commit a violent or serious felony before facing a three-strikes sentence.
People convicted of three burglaries — a serious crime — would face 25 years to life, the same as three-time losers convicted of a combination of violent crimes such rape, sex crimes involving minors, robbery, homicide, attempted murder and many others.
Under Proposition 36, about 3,000 of the 9,000 third-strikers serving 25 years to life would be eligible to file petitions to have their sentences reviewed by judges.
Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley, the Republican candidate for attorney general in 2010 and hardly a bleeding heart, is one of its main backers. He argues that disparate treatment by county prosecutors could subject the "three strikes" law to a constitutional challenge. The numbers certainly vary.
Opponents say the "three strikes" law has led to the drop in the crime rate, and we agree that it is one of the many reasons for reduced crime. But this adjustment in the "three strikes" law makes sense. Voters should support Proposition 36.
RSS
E-Mail
Print
Order reprints
