Security alarms just give false hope

October 10, 2012 

20111026 Home security

300 dpi Rick Nease illustration of burglar foiled by home with many security devices. Detroit Free Press 2011

krtnational national; krt; krtcampus campus; mctillustration; 02001003; CLJ; CRI; krtcrime crime; theft; burglar burglary; de contributed nease; dog; home security; lock; security camera; 2011; krt2011


I read with great interest the article about the rise in burglaries in Modesto (Sept. 30, Page A-1): I was not surprised, but what piqued my interest was the ineffectiveness of burglar alarms. I have long believed that these were an expensive joke that give people a false sense of security.

Let us get real; burglars do not linger in a house. They grab what they can and get out. The alarm system gets an alert, then they call the authorities and then you have to wait for police to show up — if they have an officer available.

I do not fault the police when 99 percent of the alarms were false. I have heard this in my own neighborhood and so I just ignore them. Surveillance cameras might be a good deterrent to identify the burglars, provided they do not disguise their appearance with hoodies, etc.

Although cosmetically not what we want to do, install window bars and security doors. Not an alternative for everybody, but get a good, aggressive guard dog. It has long been known that they are the best security to robbery. The costly alarms do nothing but give you false hope.



Modesto Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service